A few weeks ago, I saw a fight break out between two boys. They were maybe around 13 years old and they seemed to know each other (they were both wearing the same blue shirt and tan pants that their school seemingly mandated). Truth be told, it was less of a fight and more of a one-sided beat down.Read More
I stumbled upon this article from a while back and, while I do believe the author has her intentions in the right place, I think she's been listening to the wrong sources.
1. Banning assault weapons would do almost nothing
"...banning these guns would not do much to save American lives. Only 3.6 percent of America’s gun murders are committed with any kind of rifle, according to FBI data."
OK, 3.6 sure does sound like a small number. But another way to think about it would be that it's 25 times higher than what occurs in 22 other high income nations. If we could bring our number in line with the rest of the world - at the expense of access to a product that was never even designed for consumer use in the first place - isn't that worth doing?
2. Owning 17 guns really isn’t that extreme
"Just 3% of American adults own half the country’s guns, a new Harvard/Northeastern study estimated—and they own an average of 17 guns each.
As one gun rights activist put it, “Why do you need more than one pair of shoes? The truth is, you don’t, but do you want more than one pair of shoes? If you’re going hiking, you don’t want to use that one pair of high heels.”
Call me when a pair of shoes gets stolen - goes unreported because freedom - and gets used in a crime. I’ll wait.
3. Only a tiny fraction of America’s guns are used in crimes
“American civilians own between 265 million and 400 million guns. That’s at least one gun for every American adult. But the vast majority of America’s gun owners—and their guns—aren’t involved in this violence.”
Um, congratulations? See #1.
We can do better - without impacting the vast majority of responsible gun owners.
4. Gun crime dropped even as Americans bought more firearms
First off, it's irresponsible to assert that the whole of the gun violence epidemic has to do with crime. For example, a woman is 5x more likely to be killed by her abuser if there's a gun present, there's a straight line between easy access to guns and incidents of suicide, and - in 2016 - someone in the United States was more likely to be killed by a toddler gaining access to an unsecured gun than by a terrorist.
But assuming one still wants to confine the conversation to crime, the author falls into the dreaded "causation/correlation" trap. There are many reasons for the drop in crime that have nothing to do with a rise in gun ownership... and, just as it's both true yet irrelevant that the number of people who drowned by falling into a pool correlates with the number of films Nicolas Cage has appeared in, it's somewhat obtuse to assume that it does.
I first photographed Luis about two years ago. We spoke a lot then and have continued to speak a lot about choices and environment... about how the choices people make are so much about what seems normal in their environment.
We also talked a lot about breaking cycles. Luis, who never had a positive male role model in his life, is beyond thrilled to be a father and looks forward to giving his son the kind of influence that he never experienced.
What’s the difference between getting a driver’s license and getting a license to carry a firearm? Well, for starters, while the safety standards, education, and training that's required to get a driver’s license are more or less the same across the nation, the bar for getting a carry license varies widely.
Some states require applicants for a carry permit to complete a training course. Some of these training courses are decent, others are jokes. But some states don't even require a half-baked course. Pay a few bucks, there you go. In fact, it’s been recently revealed that four out of ten people who carry guns have received little to no training.
Wait. Let’s say that again.Read More
I read an article this morning that spoke about victims of gun violence being "in the wrong place at the wrong time" and it kinda made my skin crawl. Because here's the thing about almost everyone I've photographed during the course of this project: they, by and large, had every right to be where they were and to be doing what they were doing when their incident took place. (And even the ones that were maybe engaged in questionable activities didn't deserve to die or be permanently maimed for their sins.)
They were in schools and churches, at parties, walking down the street, sleeping in their beds, suffering from depression... and going to the movies.
The shooting at the movie theater in Aurora, CO - which took the lives of 12 people, wounded 70 more, and left scores of witnesses forever scarred - was five years ago today. I don't know what I can say that hasn't been said by so many others, except to share the words of Sandy Phillips... whose daughter Jessica was among those killed:
“If people only knew… if they only knew what it’s like to be in our shoes for even a day, this problem would be gone."
Gun violence isn't about "Chicago". It isn't about good guys vs bad guys and it isn't a case of "I don't need to worry about this because my kids go to a 'good' school". It's about what happens when ordinary people are living their lives and doing everyday things in a country with over 300 million guns... and a money-driven lobby that uses fear as a tool to put even more guns in the hands of even more people.
(Full disclosure: this post was written by a guest author, Chad R. MacDonald. The only Star Wars movie I've ever seen is the first one. Once. When it came out in the theaters. I support the premise wholeheartedly but all the references are completely lost on me.)
There is a popular Star Wars internet meme that pops up from time to time. It talks about how, when Anakin Skywalker turned to the Dark Side and killed younglings, nobody blamed the lightsaber.
No. Nobody blamed the lightsaber. But it never should have fallen into Anakin Skywalker’s hands. Yoda, Mace Windu, and the Jedi Council could see this. They said no. They knew there was something terribly wrong with him. He shouldn’t own such a powerful weapon.
But Senator Palpatine, hungry for power and motivated by his religion, manipulated events so that the lightsaber would fall into the boy’s hands. He knew the violence that would come of it. Indeed, he planned on it. His future as Emperor hinged upon it.
The senator made greater and greater power grabs, finally ousting the elected leader. He began building an army of unquestioning clones to solidify his power base. He created conflict after conflict, sacrificing his minions along the way, to keep the people distracted from his selfish climb to the top.
Anakin was buffeted with war and tragedy, while his fears were played upon by this evil man. He eventually succumbed to the unrelenting fear and rage and did horrible things. He killed innocent people. Friends. Children.
Palpatine became Emperor. With all humanity stripped from him, Skywalker became Darth Vader. He continued to commit monstrous atrocities in the name of his religion. He justified to himself he was doing the right thing.
The Emperor continued to build the military to overwhelming numbers while flooding the galaxy with munitions. Soon, even a freighter captain couldn’t go anywhere without a sidearm, regardless of his seven-foot tall Wookiee partner. The galaxy was ruled by violence and fear.
So, no, don’t blame the lightsaber. Blame a dark and greedy sub-culture justifying itself with religion and false patriotism, while glorifying violence and promoting fear. They created the atmosphere that put this weapon in the wrong man’s hands. And it caused the deaths of countless people.
Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
Don’t let them scare you.
Writing in the New Republic, Mychal Denzel Smith argues that black families feel obliged to "mourn in public"... and poses the question:
"Do we actually care enough about the people to say 'you get to choose how you grieve'? You get do that without our pressure, without feeling obliged to teach us, because we care about you as a person and whether or not you'd survive?"
Listen to the piece yourself and share your thoughts.
So-called "celebratory gunfire" is stupid. Don't do it.
Meet my friend Joe, shown here getting a haircut from his father Gregory at their home in Delaware. Joe would go to the barber or Supercuts or wherever those fortunate enough to have hair go to get their flowing locks cut but he can't because he's paralyzed.
You see, around 25 years ago, when Joe was 11 and celebrating New Year's Eve with his family, some genius thought it would be fun to fire his gun in the air as the clock struck midnight. Gravity, working as it does, brought the bullet down to Earth and it lodged itself into Joe's brain. It's still there.
If those on the side of common sense gun reform and those on the side of gun rights (sidebar: they're not mutually exclusive... but that's another post), can agree on anything, it surely should be this: Celebratory gunfire ranks at the top of the list (along with the epidemic of leaving loaded firearms within the reach of children) in terms of preventable injuries and deaths. In fact, they're 100% preventable... just don't it. It's not hard.
When I spoke with Natasha about the murder of her son Akeal, one of the many things that broke my heart was learning how difficult it was get the police to give the case the attention it deserved.... to not have them write off the death of yet another black child as gang related and to not have them rush to judgement about Akeal's character.
As a parent, it's simply unfathomable to think of having to defend the life of my child in the days following his murder.... and I don't take lightly the luxury and privilege of not having to experience the absolute height of "adding insult to injury". Learning that, while all gun violence is horrific and incidents cannot be compared against each other, not all survivors and family members are walking the same path is something that will stay with me forever.
Akeal was shot on this day in 2012 and his murder is still unresolved.
For more: http://www.ittakes.us/natasha/
The Court ruled that states and localities can make their own determinations about who can carry a concealed handgun in public... which, in my mind, makes the idea of "concealed carry reciprocity" that much more difficult to become reality.
Some say a concealed carry permit should be like a drivers license... accepted wherever you travel. On the surface, this sounds like a very reasonable argument.
Difference is, however, the requirements to obtain a drivers license are - more or less - the same from state to state while the requirements to carry a concealed weapon vary widely. For example:
- 11 states require no training whatsoever
- 15 states allow permits to certain types of domestic abusers
- 22 states allow permits to convicted stalkers
- 15 states issue permits to people under 21 (18-to 20-year-olds commit gun homicides at a rate nearly four times higher than adults 21 and older)
Additionally, reciprocity would have allowed a person denied a permit **in his home state** to get an out-of-state permit and carry back at home.
A wise (and somewhat surprising!) decision by the Court.
I’m a photographer and gun violence prevention activist. For the past couple of years, I’ve been traveling the country to share the stories of gun violence survivors and the family/friends of victims. While I try very hard to keep politics out of the photographs, I sometimes do get into it a bit on Twitter — or, as I like to call it — the Port Authority of the Internet.
Here’s a typical conversation:Read More
"Almost every gun control advocate I know hates guns and wants nothing to do with them. They are vaguely (or very) afraid of them, and believe that if they fire a gun or buy one, they will suddenly become a gun nut or turn evil."
I don’t hate guns — and neither do the scores of gun reform (not ‘control’) advocates who I know… nor are we afraid of the object itself. We instead hate how an out-of-control lobbying group, in a tandem with a Congress that’s on the take and drunk on power, fights to make it easy for guns to get into the hands of dangerous, irresponsible, and often troubled hands. We hate that they do this under the guise of freedom and patriotism when anyone whose eyes are even partially open can see that it’s solely for profit.
Further, the notion that there’s this fear that picking up a gun will suddenly transform an otherwise responsible, well-balanced person into an ‘evil gun nut’ is just silly. That being said, it is worth noting that a great many of the acts of gun violence we hear about in the news are perpetuated by people who were ‘good guys with guns’ right up until the moment that they weren’t.
To deny that easy access to guns creates the opportunity for a bad situation to turn deadly is either ignorant or willfully naive.
You had your chance.
You could’ve listened to the roughly 70% of your own membership that favors universal background checks. Every gun, every sale.
You could’ve taken a page from the playbook of the auto industry — who, at first resisted safety measures like airbags and, you know, more steel… and who are now tripping over themselves to be deemed ‘safest’.
You could’ve had a compassionate voice at time of national tragedy… instead of doubling down with your obtuse, willfully-naive ‘good guy stops bad guy’ nonsense. As if the whole of the gun violence problem comes down to ‘heroes’ and ‘thugs’. (And, yeah, we all know what you mean when you say ‘thugs’… cat's out of the bag on that one.)Read More